Abstract
At present, education in Health Sciences requires interaction with real patients, which is made more complex due to the need to ensure their health safety. For this reason, new teaching methodologies are now being implemented, which help to improve and protect safe care. Objective: This study was carried out using a quantitative approach with a non-experimental, descriptive design. Materials and Methods: The sample was non-probabilistic and consisted of 87 undergraduate students. A questionnaire was used, with 18 statements divided into 3 dimensions: dimension 1, simulation structure, with six questions reflecting aspects related to its implementation; dimension 2, learning, with seven questions related to aspects of effective communication, trust, learning and respect for diversity; dimension 3, feedback for learning, with five questions, including feedback by the teacher and the simulated patient, as well as their own views with regard to participating in another similar experience again. A five-point Likert scale was used. Results: The three dimensions studied, simulation structure, learning and feedback for learning, report a high level of positive perceptions. Conclusion: The simulation strategy is an educational tool in health-related careers that enhances the clinical competencies of the students as well as the relevant theoretical and practical skills and abilities in their learning process, promoting integration of the knowledge acquired in previous subjects.
Publisher
Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutricion
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference22 articles.
1. 1. Hernández Gutiérrez L, Barona Núñez AV, Durán Cárdenas C, Olvera Cortés HE, Ortiz Sánchez AG, Ávila Juárez SA, et al. La seguridad del paciente y la simulación clínica. Supl SIMex 2017 "La simulación y la calidad en la atención médica. 2017; 1:9-18.
2. 2. Higham H, Baxendale B. To err is human: use of simulation to enhance training and patient safety in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119 (suppl 1): i106-14. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex302.
3. 3. Padilha JM, Ribeiro A, Rosa J, Marques D, Machado PP. Clinical Virtual Simulation as Lifelong Learning Strategy-Nurse's Verdict. Clin Simul Nurs. 2020; 47:1-5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187613992030061X
4. 4. Villca S. Simulación clínica y seguridad de los pacientes en la educación médica. Rev Ciencia, Tecnol e Innovación. 2018; 16 (18): 75-88. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.bo/pdf/rcti/v16n18/a07v16n18.pdf
5. 5. Ojeda R, Carter-Thuillier B, Cresp M, Sanhueza S, Machuca C. Evaluación de competencias genéricas en estudiantes de Educación Física: una experiencia en contextos no formales. Retos. 2019;36(2):220-7. Available from: https://repositoriodigital.uct.cl/handle/10925/2609
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献