Affiliation:
1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W., Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
2. School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
3. Trent School of the Environment, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
4. The Australian Synchrotron (ANSTO), 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
Abstract
Abstract
The Pyrite Mines in Sulphide, Ontario are a collection of historic mine workings representing one of more than 6000 abandoned mines in Ontario. Historic mines are receiving renewed interest as potential sources of critical minerals for use in low carbon technologies. This study characterizes waste rock from the Pyrite Mines in the context of metal distribution, microbial activity, bioleaching, and acid mine drainage (AMD) bioremediation for the recovery of metals. Acidophilic Fe-oxidizing bacteria cultured from the waste rock produced schwertmannite [Fe8O8(OH)8−2x(SO4)x·nH2O] and ammoniojarosite [NH4Fe3(SO4)2(OH)6] with similar morphologies to those often observed in acidic sulfidic mine settings. Fe- and S-oxidizing bacteria found naturally in the waste rock were used in waste rock bioleaching column experiments that demonstrated AMD formation and metal mobilization. The columns produced acidic leachates (pH = 1.75) containing dissolved constituents, including sulfur (1577 mg/L), iron (547.7 mg/L), nickel (12.6 mg/L), manganese (7.3 mg/L), copper (2.3 mg/L), zinc (2.0 mg/L), chromium (1.5 mg/L), and titanium (0.7 mg/L). The proportion of metals successfully leached from the waste rock was variable, with leaching efficiencies calculated for nickel (31%), manganese (10.5%), iron (1.5%), chromium (1.4%), and titanium (0.02%). The leachates produced by the bioleaching columns were amended in subsequent bioremediation columns using sulfate reducing bacteria cultured from the mine site. Remediation efficiencies for elements of interest were calculated as cobalt (100%), chromium (100%), copper (100%), iron (90%), titanium (68%), nickel (52%), manganese (52%), and sulfur (43%). Mapping elemental distributions in thin sections from one of the bioleaching columns using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy revealed the heterogeneity of the waste rock. Iron was observed in both euhedral mineral grains, likely pyrite, and in secondary cements coating grains in the waste rock. Nickel, manganese, and chromium were primarily co-located with the iron. Titanium was primarily co-located with calcium in titanite (CaTiSiO5), making it challenging to target with bioleaching. This study demonstrates the heterogeneous nature of metal distribution in waste rock from this historic mine site. It indicates that successful metal recovery from legacy mine waste will require such materials to be treated as anthropogenic mineral deposits that require “exploration” and characterization much like naturally occurring ore deposits.
Publisher
Mineralogical Association of Canada
Reference45 articles.
1. Acid mine drainage (AMD): Causes, treatment and case studies;Akcil,;Journal of Cleaner Production,(2006)
2. Reprocessing feasibility of polymetallic waste rock for cleaner and sustainable mining;Amar,;Journal of Geochemical Exploration,(2021)
3. Sulfate-reducing bacteria as an effective tool for sustainable acid mine bioremediation;Ayangbenro,;Frontiers in Microbiology,(2018)
4. Microbial communities in acid mine drainage;Baker,;FEMS Microbiology Ecology,(2003)
5. Microbial populations associated with the generation and treatment of acid mine drainage;Benner,;Chemical Geology,(2000)