Affiliation:
1. National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
2. Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute named after M. F. Vladimirsky;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
3. Central Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Informatization of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Abstract
The article discusses different approaches to assessing mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis of international data shows that different countries use different approaches to assessing mortality from COVID-19 and the increase in mortality from all causes. The most probable reasons for the variability of the increase in mortality rates are the rate of spread of infection, the quality of isolation and quarantine measures, the commitment of the population to their implementation, the resource capacity of the healthcare system and the quality of medical care (both for the treatment of COVID-19 and other diseases), features of living conditions, socio-economic and political processes that are difficult to formalize (and therefore assess the contribution by methods of mathematical statistics). For a correct comparison of excess mortality rates, it will be necessary to calculate standardized indicators and compare data in five-year age groups.In 2021, serious problems should be expected with the comparison of mortality rates in different countries from individual causes. The methodology for recording deaths from COVID-19 and other causes is not uniform at the global level, problems are associated with differences in approaches to determining the primary cause of death, difficulties in determining the cause of death if a patient has multimorbid pathology (especially without postmortem examination). A full-fledged analysis is possible only with transdisciplinary cooperation under the auspices of the WHO of doctors, mathematicians, economists, and information technology specialists.
Reference44 articles.
1. Checchi F., Roberts L. Interpreting and using mortality data in humanitarian emergencies. Humanitarian Practice Network. 2005; 52: 38 p. http://www.redr.org/redr/support/TSS/doc/mortality_OliverMorgan.pdf (accessed 06.04.2021).
2. Savoia E., Lin L., Bernarnd D., et al. Public health system research in public health emergency preparedness in the United States (2009–2015): actionable knowledge base. American journal of public health. 2017; (107): e1–e6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304051 PMID: 28892437
3. Nielsen J., Mazick A., Andrews N., et al. Pooling European all-cause mortality: methodology and findings for the seasons 2008/2009 to 2010/2011. Epidemiol Infect. 2013; 141(9): 1996–2010. PMID: 23182146
4. Nielsen J., Vestergaard L.S., Richter L., et. al. European all-cause excess and infl ttributable mortality in the 2017/18 season: should the burden of infl B be reconsidered? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019; 25(10): 1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.011
5. Vestergaard L.S., Nielsen J., Krause T.G., et. al. Excess all-cause and influenza-attributable mortality in Europe, December 2016 to February 2017. Euro Surveill. 2017; 22(14): 30506. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.14.30506
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献