Author:
Febriana Tubagus Hendri,Herlambang Hendi,Hernadewita Hernadewita,Hasbullah Hasbullah,Halim Abdul
Abstract
One of the company's efforts in implementing the commitment to customer satisfaction is carried out through continuous improvement activities. All indicators are evaluated to determine the level of quality stability against process variations that will impact non-compliance with predetermined product specifications. One of the quality problems found in the tire manufacture industry is the out-percentage of tire uniformity, which suddenly increases, one of which is the value of static balance. This study analyses the process variation factors that occur to take corrective and preventive actions through a series of Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). Refers to the analysis result, it was found that there was a problem with the rubber film gauge variation at the manufacturing step of the steel breaker, one of the material components in the tire construction. Two main factors cause rubber film thickness variation: rubber sticky with roll calendar, Radial Run Out (RRO) Roll Calendar out standard, and viscosity compound variation with 12 root problems found. The results of the improvements that have been made can effectively improve rubber film thickness variation, increase the Cpk level of steel breaker material from 0.82 to 1.91 and reduce the out percentage ratio of static balance by 54.65%.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics
Reference30 articles.
1. E. W. Yunitasari, R. Widiastuti, B. S. Wisnuaji, M. Erwinda, and E. Sutanta, “Analysis of the quality of wheel chain products at UPT logam Yogyakarta using FMEA method,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1456, p. 12033, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012033.
2. S. Karabay and I. Uzman, “Importance of early detection of maintenance problems in rotating machines in management of plants: Case studies from wire and tyre plants,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 212–224, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.03.003.
3. N. Dhanrale, B. Aldar, S. Bhatambrekar, and P. Pardeshi, “Reduction of wheel unbalance during design & manufacturing by reducing process variation,” in nternational Engineering Research Journal, 2015, pp. 159–164. Available: http://www.ierjournal.org/pupload/mitpgcon/MD1-46.pdf.
4. N. A. Wessiani and F. Yoshio, “Failure mode effect analysis and fault tree analysis as a combined methodology in risk management,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 337, p. 12033, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/337/1/012033.
5. D. Safira, F. Safitri, H. Kamal, Meilani, C. M. Sujana, and A. Andika, “Time accelaration of offshore EPC project using FMEA, FTA, CPM and crashing method at PT XYZ,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 426, p. 12126, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012126.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献