Video conferencing as a face-to-face online meeting app: user preference based on usability testing-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Video conferencing as a face-to-face online meeting app: user preference based on usability testing

Published:2021-12-31 Issue:2 Volume:5 Page:98-104
ISSN:2580-2895
Container-title:Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri
language:
Short-container-title:j. sist. manaj. ind.

Author:

Wibowo Astrid Wahyu Adventri,Rahmawati Berty Dwi,Mastrisiswadi Hasan

Abstract

The global pandemic of Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) that hit Indonesia since March 2020 has changed the face-to-face system from offline to online. Video Conference (VC) becomes an alternative choice for delivering material, both learning and working. VC is a technology that allows users to hold face-to-face meetings at their respective places simultaneously. Various VC apps are becoming increasingly popular these days, such as Google Meet, Zoom, Youtube, Webex, Skype, GoTo Meeting, and Big Blue Button (BBB). This study is intended to provide a usability test of VC applications (such as Zoom, Google Meet, and BBB) and provide recommendations for VC as an online conference media based on user preferences. The usability measurement technique used is the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the USE questionnaire. The results of this study show that Zoom has the highest usability value compared to Google Meet and BBB, Google Meet is ranked second and BBB is ranked third.

Publisher

Universitas Serang Raya

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics

Reference29 articles.

1. J. M. Denstadli, T. E. Julsrud, and R. J. Hjorthol, “Videoconferencing as a Mode of Communication,” J. Bus. Tech. Commun., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 65–91, Jan. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651911421125.

2. International Organization for Standardization, “9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs),” Int. Organ. Stand., vol. 45, no. 9, 1998. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/16883.html.

3. J. Brooke, “SUS: a retrospective,” J. usability Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 29–40, 2013. Available: https://uxpajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/pdf/JUS_Brooke_February_2013.pdf.

4. J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro, “Item benchmarks for the system usability scale.,” J. Usability Stud., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 158–167, 2018. Available: https://uxpajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/pdf/JUS_Lewis_May2018.pdf.

5. P. T. Kortum and A. Bangor, “Usability Ratings for Everyday Products Measured With the System Usability Scale,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 67–76, Jan. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.681221.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “There’s an Etiquette to Zoom That’s Not Really Present In-Person”: A Qualitative Study Showing How the Mute Button Shapes Virtual Postpartum Support for New Parents;Qualitative Health Research;2023-08-09