Affiliation:
1. University of Oregon, 1285 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 (email: )
2. Uber Technologies Inc., 1455 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94103 (email: )
Abstract
We study the geographic incidence and efficiency of an income tax by estimating a spatial equilibrium model with heterogeneous workers. The US income tax shifts households out of high-productivity cities, leading to locational inefficiency of 0.25 percent of output. Removing spatial tax distortions increases inequality because more educated households are more mobile and own larger shares of land. Flattening the tax schedule, or introducing cost-of-living adjustments or local wage adjustments leads to efficiency gains but causes substantial increases in inequality. Differences in mobility and land ownership across skill groups create an equity-efficiency trade-off that is unique to spatial settings. (JEL H24, H22, D31, J31, J24, R23)
Publisher
American Economic Association
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. City, Amenities, and Welfare;Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics;2024
2. Social Transfers and Spatial Distortions;Journal of Labor Economics;2023-07-05
3. Vertical migration externalities;Regional Science and Urban Economics;2023-07
4. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off in the Presence of Distorting Taxation;Theoretical Economics Letters;2023
5. Spatial Sorting and Inequality;Annual Review of Economics;2022-08-12