Affiliation:
1. Stanford University and NBER (email: )
2. University of Mannheim and CEPR (email: )
3. Princeton University and NBER (email: )
4. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (email: )
5. University of Copenhagen and CEPR (email: )
Abstract
In the 1920s, the United States substantially reduced immigration by imposing country-specific entry quotas. We compare local labor markets differentially exposed to the quotas due to variation in the national-origin mix of their immigrant population. US-born workers in areas losing immigrants did not benefit relative to workers in less exposed areas. Instead, in urban areas, European immigrants were replaced with internal migrants and immigrants from Mexico and Canada. By contrast, farmers shifted toward capital-intensive agriculture, and the immigrant-intensive mining industry contracted. These differences highlight the uneven effects of the quota system at the local level. (JEL J15, J18, J31, K37, N32, N42, R23)
Publisher
American Economic Association
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference104 articles.
1. Abramitzky, Ran, Philipp Ager, Leah Boustan, Elior Cohen, and Casper W. Hansen. 2023. "Replication data for: The Effect of Immigration Restrictions on Local Labor Markets: Lessons from the 1920s Border Closure." American Economic Association [publisher], Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.38886/E143121V1.
2. Immigration in American Economic History
3. To the New World and Back Again: Return Migrants in the Age of Mass Migration
4. Europe's Tired, Poor, Huddled Masses: Self-Selection and Economic Outcomes in the Age of Mass Migration
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献