Affiliation:
1. University of Bonn (email: )
2. Humboldt Universität Berlin (email: )
Abstract
We study monopolistic screening when some consumers are data sensitive and incur a privacy cost if their purchase reveals information to the monopolist. The monopolist discriminates between data-sensitive and classical consumers using privacy mechanisms that consist of a direct mechanism and a privacy option. A privacy mechanism is optimal for large privacy costs and leaves classical consumers better off than data-sensitive consumers with the same valuation. When privacy preferences become public information, data-sensitive consumers and the monopolist gain, whereas classical consumers lose. Our results are relevant for policies targeting consumers’ data awareness, such as the European General Data Protection Regulation. (JEL D11, D42, D82, D83, L12)
Publisher
American Economic Association
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference27 articles.
1. Too Much Data: Prices and Inefficiencies in Data Markets
2. The Economics of Privacy
3. Athey, Susan. 2014. Information, Privacy, and the Internet: An Economic Perspective. The Hague, Netherlands: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
4. Privacy and Malfeasance: A Comment
5. On the optimality of privacy in sequential contracting
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms;American Economic Review;2024-08-01
2. Privacy regulation in asymmetric environments;Journal of Regulatory Economics;2024-05-08