Affiliation:
1. Harvard University (email: )
2. Harvard Kennedy School and NBER (email: )
3. Harvard Law School and NBER (email: ).
Abstract
We ask whether increased public scrutiny leads to the more effective use of predictive algorithms. We focus on the context of bail, where judges face heightened public scrutiny during competitive partisan elections. We find that judges up for reelection are much more likely to follow the algorithmic recommendation to detain high-risk defendants just before an election. However, release decisions return to normal shortly after the election, and there is little change in pretrial misconduct rates, indicating that heightened public scrutiny, at least through competitive partisan elections, will not lead to the more effective use of predictive algorithms in bail.
Publisher
American Economic Association
Reference13 articles.
1. Abaluck, Jason, Leila Agha, David C. Chan Jr., Daniel Singer, and Diana Zhu. 2021. "Fixing Misallocation with Guidelines: Awareness versus Adherence." NBER Working Paper 27467.
2. Electoral Sentencing Cycles
3. Angelova, Victoria, Will S. Dobbie, and Crystal Yang. 2023. "Algorithmic Recommendations and Human Discretion." NBER Working Paper 31747.
4. Angelova, Victoria, Will S. Dobbie, and Crystal Yang. 2024. "Replication data for: Algorithmic Recommendations When the Stakes Are High: Evidence from Judicial Elections." American Economic Association [publisher], Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.1257/ E197141V1.
5. Crime, Punishment, and Politics: An Analysis of Political Cycles in Criminal Sentencing