Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States Since 1850: Reply-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States Since 1850: Reply

Published:2013-08-01 Issue:5 Volume:103 Page:2041-2049
ISSN:0002-8282
Container-title:American Economic Review
language:en
Short-container-title:American Economic Review

Author:

Long Jason¹,Ferrie Joseph²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Economics, Wheaton College, 501 College Avenue, Wheaton, IL 60187.

2. Department of Economics and Institute For Policy Research, Northwestern University, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208; and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Abstract

We respond to several criticisms by Avery Guest and Michael Hout (2013) and Yu Xie and Alexandra Killewald (2013) to Jason Long and Joseph Ferrie (2013). We do not dispute Guest and Hout's characterization of the importance of total mobility in addition to relative mobility. We find much in their additional analyses that supports our original findings. In response to Xie and Killewald, we discuss the limitations of our data and the conceptualization of mobility. (JEL J62, N31, N32, N33, N34)

Publisher

American Economic Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Link

https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/aer.103.5.2041

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Intergenerational Mobility in American History: Accounting for Race and Measurement Error;American Economic Review;2023-12-01

2. Who gets left behind by left behind places?;Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society;2023-09-29

3. Social Mobility in Sweden before the Welfare State;The Journal of Economic History;2023-03-28

4. Multigenerational persistence: Evidence from 146 years of administrative data;Journal of Human Resources;2021-04-13

5. The changing geography of social mobility in the United States;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2020-11-16