Affiliation:
1. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 101 Market Street MS 1130, San Francisco, CA 94105 (e-mail: )
2. University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 (e-mail: )
Abstract
Term premia implied by maximum likelihood estimates of affine term structure models are misleading because of small-sample bias. We show that accounting for this bias alters the conclusions about the trend, cycle, and macroeconomic determinants of the term premia estimated in Wright (2011). His term premium estimates are essentially acyclical, and often just parallel the secular trend in longterm interest rates. In contrast, bias-corrected term premia show pronounced countercyclical behavior, consistent with theoretical and empirical arguments about movements in risk premia. (JEL E31, E43, E52, G12, H63)
Publisher
American Economic Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献