Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions

Author:

Artinger Florian M.1,Gigerenzer Gerd2,Jacobs Perke3

Affiliation:

1. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Simply Rational—The Decision Institute, and Berlin International University of Applied Sciences.

2. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Simply Rational—The Decision Institute, and Harding Center for Risk Literacy.

3. Max Planck Institute for Human Development.

Abstract

In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: an agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational. (JEL D11, D80, D90)

Publisher

American Economic Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference242 articles.

1. Utility Function Charnes and Cooper (1963) binary utility

2. Borch (1968) binary utility

3. Fishburn (1977) risk preferences

4. Payne, Laughhunn, and Crum (1980, 1981) risk preferences

5. Brown and Sim (2009) risk preferences

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3