Affiliation:
1. CREST École Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris (email: )
2. Department of Economics, Daniels School of Business, Purdue University (email: )
3. VUI.Agency (email: )
Abstract
How do electoral incentives influence the choice to experiment with a policy reform that generates uncertain future benefits? To answer this question, we examine a two-period model of redistributive politics with uncertain policy outcomes involving a mixture of private and public benefits. In equilibrium, we find that the intertemporal trade-off between current policy costs and future benefits creates an incentive for politicians to use public debt to smooth spending across periods. The higher the share of policy benefits that are in the form of a public good, the higher the level of available debt-related spending on targeted policies that is necessary. (JEL D63, D72, E23, H41, H63)
Publisher
American Economic Association
Reference99 articles.
1. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York, NY: Crown Business.
2. Aghion, Philippe, and Patrick Bolton. 1990. Government Domestic Debt and the Risk of Default: A Political- Economic Model of the Strategic Role of Debt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Aguiar, Mark, and Manuel Amador. 2014. "Sovereign Debt." In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, edited by Gita Gopinath, Elhanan Helpman, and Kenneth Rogoff, 647-87. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Alesina, A., and A. Passalacqua. 2016. "The Political Economy of Government Debt." In Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, edited by John B. Taylor and Harald Uhlig, 2599-2651. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献