The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures

Author:

Kane Thomas J1,Staiger Douglas O2

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Policy Studies and Economics,University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Faculty Research Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

2. Associate Professor of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Abstract

In recent years, most states have constructed elaborate accountability systems using school-level test scores. However, because the median elementary school contains only 69 children per grade level, such measures are quite imprecise. We evaluate the implications for school accountability systems. For instance, rewards or sanctions for schools with scores at either extreme primarily affect small schools and provide weak incentives to large ones. Nevertheless, we conclude that accountability systems may be worthwhile. Even in states with aggressive financial incentives, the marginal reward to schools for raising student performance is a small fraction of the potential labor market value for students.

Publisher

American Economic Association

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Economics and Econometrics

Cited by 256 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Beyond the school building: Examining the association between out-of-school factors and multidimensional school grades;Education Policy Analysis Archives;2024-07-02

2. Revealing Stereotypes: Evidence from Immigrants in Schools;American Economic Review;2024-07-01

3. Adapting Assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic;2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education & Research (ICALTER);2023-12-13

4. How Free Market Logic Fails in Schooling—And What It Means for the Role of Government;Educational Researcher;2023-12-11

5. Housing market and school choice response to school quality information shocks✰;Journal of Urban Economics;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3