A Quest for an Eco-centric Approach to International Law: the COVID-19 Pandemic as Game Changer

Author:

De Vido SaraORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis Reflection starts from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as unprecedented occasio to reflect on the approach to international law, which—it is contended—is anthropocentric, and its inadequacy to respond to current challenges. In the first part, the Reflection argues that there is, more than ever, an undeferrable need for a change of approach to international law toward ecocentrism, which puts the environment at the center and conceives the environment as us, including humans, non-human beings, and natural objects. To encourage the incorporation of ecocentrism in the entire discipline, the Reflection will rely on some insight of ecofeminism, whose potential has not been fully investigated in international legal scholarship. In the second part, the Reflection illustrates what an eco-centric international law would mean, imagining three possible applications: first, what the author has called environmental global health, which is connected to the current pandemic and puts into question the proposals dealing with global health that completely miss the theorization of the environment as a whole; second, how actors of international law would change according to an eco-centric perspective; and, third, how the rules prohibiting the use of force might be reconceptualized. The analysis contained in these pages cannot itself exhaust all the possible nuances of the legal reasoning, but it is aimed at being a provocative starting point for a change in the mindset and approach of international legal scholarship.

Funder

Università Ca' Foscari Venezia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Engineering

Reference73 articles.

1. Adams CJ (1991) Ecofeminism and the eating of animals. Hypatia 6:125–145

2. Agarwal B (1992) The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Fem Stud 18:119–158

3. Baldin S (2019) Il buen vivir nel costituzionalismo andino. Profili comparativi, Giappichelli, Torino

4. Bekker PHF (1996) Advisory opinions of the world court on the legality of nuclear weapons. Asil Insights 5:1 Available at https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/1/issue/5/advisory-opinions-world-court-legality-nuclear-weapons. Accessed 25 August 2020

5. Besson S (2020) Sovereign states and their international institutional order carrying forward Dworkin’s work on the political legitimacy of international law. Jus Cogens 2:111–138

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3