Abstract
AbstractThis Reflection starts from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as unprecedented occasio to reflect on the approach to international law, which—it is contended—is anthropocentric, and its inadequacy to respond to current challenges. In the first part, the Reflection argues that there is, more than ever, an undeferrable need for a change of approach to international law toward ecocentrism, which puts the environment at the center and conceives the environment as us, including humans, non-human beings, and natural objects. To encourage the incorporation of ecocentrism in the entire discipline, the Reflection will rely on some insight of ecofeminism, whose potential has not been fully investigated in international legal scholarship. In the second part, the Reflection illustrates what an eco-centric international law would mean, imagining three possible applications: first, what the author has called environmental global health, which is connected to the current pandemic and puts into question the proposals dealing with global health that completely miss the theorization of the environment as a whole; second, how actors of international law would change according to an eco-centric perspective; and, third, how the rules prohibiting the use of force might be reconceptualized. The analysis contained in these pages cannot itself exhaust all the possible nuances of the legal reasoning, but it is aimed at being a provocative starting point for a change in the mindset and approach of international legal scholarship.
Funder
Università Ca' Foscari Venezia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Adams CJ (1991) Ecofeminism and the eating of animals. Hypatia 6:125–145
2. Agarwal B (1992) The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Fem Stud 18:119–158
3. Baldin S (2019) Il buen vivir nel costituzionalismo andino. Profili comparativi, Giappichelli, Torino
4. Bekker PHF (1996) Advisory opinions of the world court on the legality of nuclear weapons. Asil Insights 5:1 Available at https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/1/issue/5/advisory-opinions-world-court-legality-nuclear-weapons. Accessed 25 August 2020
5. Besson S (2020) Sovereign states and their international institutional order carrying forward Dworkin’s work on the political legitimacy of international law. Jus Cogens 2:111–138
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献