Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future

Published:2016-06-02 Issue:1 Volume:12 Page:23-34
ISSN:1874-5490
Container-title:Neuroethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Neuroethics

Author:

Bublitz Jan Christoph

Funder

Volkswagen Foundation

Fondation Brocher

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy,Neurology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12152-016-9265-8.pdf

Reference34 articles.

1. Persson, Ingmar and Julian Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the Future: The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Gifford, Robert. 2011. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaption. American Psychologist 66(4): 290–302.

3. American Psychological Association. 2011. Report: Psychology & Global Climate Change. www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change-booklet.pdf

4. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1975. The right to privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 295–314.

5. Scanlon, Thomas. 1975. Thompson on privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 315–322.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mental Privacy, Cognitive Liberty, and Hog-tying;Journal of Bioethical Inquiry;2024-06-03

2. The Impossibility of a Moral Right to Privacy;Neuroethics;2022-06-28

3. Moral Enhancement and the Public Good;2021-05-19

4. Freedom of Thought as an International Human Right: Elements of a Theory of a Living Right;The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought, Volume 1;2021

5. Public Attitudes Towards Moral Enhancement. Evidence that Means Matter Morally;Neuroethics;2017-07-27