Abstract
AbstractThe increasing availability of brain data within and outside the biomedical field, combined with the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to brain data analysis, poses a challenge for ethics and governance. We identify distinctive ethical implications of brain data acquisition and processing, and outline a multi-level governance framework. This framework is aimed at maximizing the benefits of facilitated brain data collection and further processing for science and medicine whilst minimizing risks and preventing harmful use. The framework consists of four primary areas of regulatory intervention: binding regulation, ethics and soft law, responsible innovation, and human rights.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy,Neurology,Philosophy
Reference51 articles.
1. Insel, T.R. 2017. Digital phenotyping: Technology for a new science of behavior. JAMA 318 (13): 1215–1216.
2. Ienca, M., P. Haselager, and E.J. Emanuel. 2018. Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 36 (9): 805–810.
3. Wang Y, S. Hong, C. Tai. 2019. China’s Efforts to Lead the Way in AI Start in Its Classrooms. The Wall Street Journal [published Online First: Oct. 24, 2019].
4. Chen, S. 2018. Forget the Facebook leak’: China is mining data directly from workers’ brains on an industrial scale. South China Morning Post 29.
5. Emondi, A. 2019. Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology: DARPA. Link: https://www.darpa.mil/program/nextgeneration-nonsurgical-neurotechnology.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献