The Neuroscience of Decision Making and Our Standards for Assessing Competence to Consent-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Neuroscience of Decision Making and Our Standards for Assessing Competence to Consent

Published:2011-11-24 Issue:1 Volume:6 Page:189-196
ISSN:1874-5490
Container-title:Neuroethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Neuroethics

Author:

Clarke Steve

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy,Neurology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12152-011-9144-2.pdf

Reference37 articles.

1. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed, 79. New York: Oxford University Press.

2. Buchanan, A., and D. Brock. 1990. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision-making, 18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Gert, B., C.M. Culver, and D.K. Clouser. 1997. Bioethics: A return to fundamentals, 137. New York: Oxford University Press.

4. Welie, J.V.M., and Welie, S.P.K. 2001. Patient Decision-Making Competence: Outline of a Conceptual Analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4: 127–138: 133.

5. Appelbaum, P.S., and T. Grisso. 2001. MacCAT-CR: MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research. Sarasota, FLA: Professional Resources Press.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Should Neuroscience Inform Judgements of Decision-Making Capacity?;Neuroethics;2018-05-09

2. Mastering Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Neuroscience Perspectives in the Information Age;Applying Neuroscience to Business Practice;2017

3. Investigating the Roles of Neuroscience and Knowledge Management in Higher Education;Handbook of Research on Administration, Policy, and Leadership in Higher Education;2017

4. Capacity, Consistency and the Young;Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations;2016