Incarceration, Direct Brain Intervention, and the Right to Mental Integrity – a Reply to Thomas Douglas-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Incarceration, Direct Brain Intervention, and the Right to Mental Integrity – a Reply to Thomas Douglas

Published:2016-04-04 Issue:2 Volume:9 Page:107-118
ISSN:1874-5490
Container-title:Neuroethics
language:en
Short-container-title:Neuroethics

Author:

Craig Jared N.

Funder

N/A

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Health Policy,Neurology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12152-016-9255-x.pdf

Reference63 articles.

1. Darabont, F., and S. King. 1994. The Shawshank redemption. United States: Columbia TriStar Home Video.

2. Darabont, F., and S. King. 1996. The Shawshank redemption: The shooting script. United States: Nick Hern Books.

3. King, S. 2010. Different seasons. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

4. Gillespie, W., and ebrary Inc. 2002. Prisonization individual and institutional factors affecting inmate conduct. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.

5. Weizhi, D. 2010. Prisoners vs. the institution: Resistance in The Shawshank Redemption. Folio 9: 36–43.

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mental integrity, autonomy, and fundamental interests;Journal of Medical Ethics;2024-08-13

2. Towards a Human Right to Psychological Continuity? Reflections on the Rights to Personal Identity, Self-Determination, and Personal Integrity;European Convention on Human Rights Law Review;2024-04-11

3. Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis;Journal of Medical Ethics;2024-02-26

4. An Intuitive, Abductive Argument for a Right against Mental Interference;The Journal of Ethics;2024-02-21

5. Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: On the Scope of the Moral Right to Bodily Integrity;Neuroethics;2023-09-27