The Local Provision of Restorative Justice in Scotland: an Exploratory Empirical Study

Author:

Maglione GiuseppeORCID,Buchan Jamie,Robertson Laura

Abstract

AbstractThis article presents the results of the first empirical qualitative research on the provision of restorative justice (RJ) in Scotland, based on interviews with 14 practitioners. In Scotland, RJ has attracted the attention of penal reformers and practitioners since the late 1980s, offering an alternative to criminal justice practices based on retribution and/or rehabilitation whilst promising to reduce reoffending and heal people harmed by crime. In 2017, the Scottish Government has fully recognized the existence of RJ by issuing the first national ‘Guidance’ for the delivery of this process, followed by an ambitious ‘Action Plan’. In spite of such a long-lasting interest and recent policy recognition, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the organization and actual delivery of RJ in Scotland. In fact, research on this subject is scant, anecdotal and dated. This article addresses this knowledge gap by presenting original data on the provision of RJ within Scottish local authorities. The findings show similar understandings of RJ, context-specific organizational models and common systemic challenges characterizing RJ providers, generating evidence to critically assess recent Scottish policy on RJ, whilst drawing implications with relevance for the development of RJ across Europe.

Funder

Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law

Reference47 articles.

1. Benbow, N. L. (2019). Preventing youth crime in Scotland: The practices of early intervention and diversion under ‘Whole System Approach’ implementation. PhD thesis. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/29670/1/Final%20Draft%20Revised%20May%202019.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2020.

2. Bradford, B., & MacQueen, S. (2011). Diversion from prosecution to social work in Scotland: A snapshot of current patterns and an examination of practice in three CJA’s. Glasgow: SCCJR.

3. Braithwaite, J. (2000). Restorative justice and social justice. Saskatchewan Law Review, 63, 185–194.

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

5. Brodie, I., Nottingham, C. & Plunkett, S. (2008). A Tale of Two Reports: Social Work in Scotland from Social Work and the Community (1966) to Changing Lives (2006). British Journal of Social Work, 38(4), 697–715.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3