Taser Use in Scotland: a Qualitative Study of Police Officer and Community Perspectives

Author:

Deuchar Ross,Frondigoun Liz,Densley James A.,Davidones Catherine

Abstract

AbstractThis study delves into police and public views on Taser deployment in Scotland, coinciding with its most significant introduction. Using comprehensive qualitative data, we highlight findings from interviews with 13 Specialized Training Officers (STOs), responses from 88 police officers, and focus groups involving 66 community members in western Scotland. Findings indicate officers largely perceive Tasers as an effective deterrent against violent crime, enhancing community safety. However, while the general public is predominantly supportive, concerns arise regarding potential misuse against youth and risks posed to the vulnerable. These apprehensions cast doubts over further Taser expansions. The study underscores key considerations for future policies, operational practices, and research avenues.

Funder

Scottish Institute for Policing Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference77 articles.

1. Adams, K., & Jennison, V. (2007). What we do not know about police use of tasers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 447–465.

2. Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. D. (2010). Policy and training recommendations related to police use of CEDs: Overview of findings from a comprehensive national study. Police Quarterly, 13, 235–259.

3. Alpert, G. P., Smith, M., Kaminski, R. K., Fridell, L. A., MacDonald, J., & Kubu, B. (2011). Police use of force, TASER devices and other less-lethal weapons. National Institute of Justice.

4. American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California. (2005). Stun gun fallacy: How the lack of Taser regulation endangers lives. American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.

5. Amnesty International. (1995). McCann & Others v. the United Kingdom. Retrieved September 4, 2021, from: https://policehumanrightsresources.org/mccann-and-others-v-the-united-kingdom-application-no-18984-91. Accessed 28 Oct 2023

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3