Abstract
AbstractThis study looks at the variations in end-of-life care in North-East Essex (eastern England) combining hospital records, official death records and the local electronic end-of-life coordination tool. These differences included dying in hospital (versus a general wish to die in the usual place of residence), and inequity in care provision: the place of death varying according to the cause of death (even for highly predictable conditions); and deprivation being associated with a greater likelihood of dying in hospital. There was a positive correlation between the use of an electronic end-of-life coordination system and dying in the preferred place of care. The results suggest two actions for policy makers. First, look at variations in end-of-life care so that areas of need can be identified. Second, use of an electronic end-of-life coordination tool is correlated with a reduction in unwarranted variation in the place of death.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. Department for Health and Social Care. (2022) Health Care Bill; integration measures. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-and-care-bill-factsheets/health-and-care-bill-integration-measures. Accessed Jul 2022.
2. Thomas K, Gray M (2018) Population-based, person-centred end-of-life care: time for a rethink. Br J Gen Pract. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X694925
3. Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N et al (2012) Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flaners, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol 23:2006–2015
4. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JAC, Van Der Heide A (2014) The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliative medicine. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314526272
5. End of life care for adults: service delivery NICE guideline. (2019). Retrieved from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng142