Differences in healthcare structures, processes and outcomes of neighbouring European countries: the example of Germany and the Netherlands

Author:

Schwettmann LarsORCID,Hamprecht Axel,Seeber Gesine H.ORCID,Pichler Stefan,Voss AndreasORCID,Ansmann Lena,Hoffmann Falk

Abstract

AbstractAlthough healthcare systems across Europe face rather similar challenges, their organization varies widely. Even neighbouring countries substantially differ with respect to healthcare structures, processes, and resulting outcomes. Focusing on Germany and the Netherlands as examples of such neighbouring countries, this paper will first identify and discuss similarities and major differences between both systems on the macro-level of healthcare. It further argues that it is often unknown how these differences trickle down to individual healthcare organizations, providers, patients or citizens, i.e., to the meso- and micro-level of healthcare. Hence, in a second step, potential implications of macro-level differences are described by considering the examples of total hip arthroplasty, antibiotic prescription practices and resistance, and nursing home care in Germany and the Netherlands. The paper concludes with an outlook on how these differences can be studied using the example of the project “Comparison of healthcare structures, processes and outcomes in the Northern German and Dutch cross-border region” (CHARE-GD). It further discusses potential prospects and challenges of corresponding cross-national research.

Funder

Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. OECD/European Union (2022) Health at a Glance: Europe 2022: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/23056088.

2. Papanicolas I, Smith PC (2013) Health system performance comparison. An agenda for policy, information and research. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series. World Heal Organ

3. Girvan G, Roy A (2021) Key Findings from the 2021 FREOPP World Index of Healthcare Innovation. Austin, Texas

4. Schneider EC, Shah A, Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Fields K, Williams RD II (2021) Reflecting poorly: health care in the US compared to other high-income countries. Commonwealth Fund, New York

5. Capano G, Zito AR, Toth F, Rayner J (2022) The healthcare sector. In: Capano G, Zito AR, Toth F, Rayner J (eds) Trajectories of governance: how states shaped policy sectors in the Neoliberal Age. Springer International Publishing, Cham, p 115–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07457-8_4

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3