Abstract
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
How body mass index (BMI) affects pelvic floor function after a second-degree perineal laceration is unknown. The hypothesis of this study is that pelvic floor dysfunction and complications after an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration are more common in women with a higher BMI 8 weeks postpartum.
Methods
This register-based cohort study includes 10,876 primiparous women with an obstetric second-degree perineal laceration between 2014 and 2021. Data were retrieved from the Swedish Perineal Laceration Registry. Outcomes in relation to maternal BMI were urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI) and common complications attributable to the laceration. Uni- and multivariate logistic regressions were used for comparison between normal weight (BMI < 24.9, reference), overweight (25.0–29.9) and obese (≥ 30) women.
Results
Multivariate analyses showed an increased risk for UI in both overweight and obese women compared to normal-weight women 8 weeks after a second-degree perineal laceration with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.21 (CI 1.02–1.44) and 1.27 (CI 1.13–1.58) respectively. Overweight and obese women had a decreased risk for AI (aOR 0.81, CI 0.68–0.96; aOR 0.72, CI 0.57–0.90 respectively) compared with normal-weight women. No significant differences were found in the univariate analyses over BMI strata concerning complications after perineal laceration.
Conclusions
Primiparous overweight and obese women report less AI and more UI than normal-weight women 8 weeks after a second-degree perineal laceration. No differences were found regarding complications. These findings are new and merit further study to find potential preventive factors and interventions after a second-degree perineal laceration.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference30 articles.
1. Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL, et al. Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):627–35.
2. Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Gåreberg Lindblom B, Hagberg H. A prospective observational study on tears during vaginal delivery: occurrences and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(1):44–9.
3. Edqvist M, Hildingsson I, Mollberg M, Lundgren I, Lindgre H. Midwives’ management during the second stage of labor in relation to second-degree tears—an experimental study. Birth. 2017;44(1):86–94.
4. Jansson MH, Franzén K, Hiyoshi A, Tegerstedt G, Dahlgren H, Nilsson K. Risk factors for perineal and vaginal tears in primiparous women—the prospective POPRACT-cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):749.
5. RCOG The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. Green-top guideline no. 29 June 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-29.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2023.