FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases series 4: is taking out all of a mesh sling too extreme?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases series 4: is taking out all of a mesh sling too extreme?

Published:2019-12-02 Issue:2 Volume:31 Page:221-225
ISSN:0937-3462
Container-title:International Urogynecology Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Int Urogynecol J

Author:

Rosenfeld Emily B.,Yurteri-Kaplan Ladin A.,Maher Chris,Bazi Tony,Svabik Kamil,Houlihan Sara,Grimes Cara L.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Urology,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-019-04172-9.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. Cundiff G, Quinlan D, Rensburg JV, Slack M. Foundation for an evidence-informed algorithm for treating pelvic floor mesh complications: a review. BJOG-Int J Obstet Gy. 2018;125:1026–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15148.

2. Devakumar H, Chandrasekaran N, Alas A, et al. Resolution of rectal prolapse by vaginal reconstruction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23:e4–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000354.

3. Dray E, Crosby E, Grable A, et al. A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes and risk factors for persistent postoperative symptoms following synthetic mid urethral sling revision. J Urol. 2019;202:339–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000246.

4. Feiner B, Maher C. Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:325–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181cbca4d.

5. Ramart P, Ackerman AL, Cohen SA, et al. The risk of recurrent urinary incontinence requiring surgery after suburethral sling removal for mesh complications. Urology. 2017;106:203–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.060.