A neutral core of degressively proportional allocations under lexicographic preferences of agents

Author:

Cegiełka KatarzynaORCID,Dniestrzański PiotrORCID,Łyko JanuszORCID,Maciuk ArkadiuszORCID,Szczeciński MaciejORCID

Abstract

AbstractOne of the main problems of practical applications of degressively proportional allocations of goods and burdens is lack of uniqueness of this principle. Even under given boundary conditions of allocation, i.e. determined minimal and maximal amounts of a good that can be assigned in a given allocation, there are usually many feasible solutions. The lack of formal rules of allocation is the reason why the allocation is typically a result of negotiations among its agents. A number of allocations favor some of agents or their groups, therefore other agents cannot accept them. The aim of this paper is to indicate a way of reducing the set of all feasible solutions exclusively to those that are neutral to all agents. As a result of the term of lexicographic preference of allocation agents defined on the basis of the relation theory followed by a numerical analysis of sets of all feasible solutions, it is possible to determine a core of this set in the form of a subset of all feasible solutions that are acceptable by all agents. In addition, this subset can be further divided into smaller subsets with regard to the degree of acceptance of their elements. Theoretical analysis is complemented by case studies, one of which is application of this idea to the allocation of seats in the European Parliament among the member states of the European Union.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. Agenor, P.-R., & Neanidis, K. (2011). The allocation of public expenditure and economic growth. The Manchester School, 79(4), 899–931

2. Arora, S., Gupta, D., & Jain, S. (2016). An improvement in LaRSA and its implementation on allocation of seats to categories in an organization. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 6, 182–189

3. Barbera, S., & Jackson, M. O. (2006). On the weights of nations: Assigning voting weights in a heterogeneous union. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 317–339

4. Beisbart, C., & Bovens, L. (2007). Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(4), 581–608

5. Cegiełka, K., Dniestrzański, P., Łyko, J., & Maciuk, A. (2019a). Ordering and priority of entitlements in the problem of degressively proportional allocation. In Economic and social development. 41st international scientific conference on economic and social development, Book of Proceedings, Belgrade, Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, 133–140 

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3