Abstract
AbstractThis paper represents the first attempt to employ a long series of repeated cross-sectional data from the Kazakhstani National Statistics as the pseudo-panel for estimating returns to schooling. We found the returns to be relatively high and internationally comparable. The cohort effect turned out to be negative, suggesting the interpretation of the business cycle’s impact. The gender gap in returns has additionally been revealed: while females tend to earn less, the returns are higher for them, which can likely be explained by gender differences in labor allocation across sectors and industries and, in turn, explains the higher levels of education amongst women.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Arabsheibani, G. R., & Mussurov, A. (2007). Returns to schooling in Kazakhstan: OLS and instrumental variables approach. The Economics of Transition, 15(2), 341–364.
2. Arrow, K. J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2(3), 193–216.
3. Baltagi, B. H., & Kao, C. (2000). Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: A survey, vol. 136. Center for Policy Research. https://surface.syr.edu/cpr/136. Accessed 8 Mar 2020.
4. Barro, R., Caselli, F., & Lee, J. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.
5. Betts, J. R., & McFarland, L. L. (1995). Safe port in a storm: The impact of labor market conditions on community college enrollments. Journal of Human Resources, 30(4), 741–765.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献