Author:
Ivanova Polina,Momesso Lara
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter summarises the main findings of this volume on refugees and asylum seekers in Japan and Taiwan, in relation to its stated objectives and its chosen conceptual framework. It emphasises the interrelation between the three main parts of the book: legal and policy frameworks, media representation and public opinion, and lived experiences. It examines implications of the findings, their applicability beyond the given geopolitical scope and sociocultural context and acknowledges the limitations of the project. Based on the main findings and tendencies that have emerged from the investigated case studies, the chapter formulates recommendations for further research and for policy and practice.
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference20 articles.
1. Abuya, E. O. (2010). From here to where? Refugees living in protracted situations in Africa. In A. Edwards & C. Ferstman (Eds.), Human security and non-citizens: Law, policy and international affairs (pp. 125–165). Cambridge University Press.
2. Bellamy, A. J. & McDonald, M. (2002). “The utility of human security:” Which humans? What security? A reply to Thomas and Tow. Security Dialogue, 33(3), 373–377. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26298086
3. Betts, A. (2015). The normative terrain of the global refugee regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679415000350
4. Kawarada, S. (2021, June 16). Immigration chief vows to stop detaining all visa overstayers. The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved August 22, 2023, from https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14374124
5. Lester, E. (2010). Socio-economic rights, human security and survival migrants: Whose rights? Whose security? In A. Edwards & C. Ferstman (Eds.), Human security and non-citizens: Law, policy and international affairs (pp. 314–356). Cambridge University Press.