Multimodal and Multicultural Field Agents: Considerations for “outside-the-lab” Studies
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Reference33 articles.
1. Bi, T., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Singh, A., Costanza, E.: Understanding the shared experience of runners and spectators in long-distance running events. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’19, pp. 461:1–461:13. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300691 2. Boyd, L.E., Rector, K., Profita, H., Stangl, A.J., Zolyomi, A., Kane, S.K., Hayes, G.R.: Understanding the role fluidity of stakeholders during assistive technology research “in the wild”. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, pp. 6147–6158. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025493 3. Brinkmann, S., Kvale, S.: InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications, California (2014) 4. Charles, F., Pecune, F., Aranyi, G., Pelachaud, C., Cavazza, M.: Eca control using a single affective user dimension. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI ’15, pp. 183–190. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818346.2820730 5. Claes, S., Wouters, N., Slegers, K., Vande Moere, A.: Controlling in-the-wild evaluation studies of public displays. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’15, pp. 81–84. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702353
|
|