Abstract
AbstractOn the basis of a critical survey of university strategies, it is argued that universities reify and objectify “world class” and turn it into absolute and precisely defined goals (location in ranking hierarchies, publication patterns, number of start-ups and licens-es, etc.) and that this in turn is based on a skewed reading of the ascendancy of some universities (notably leading US higher education institutions) to that level. The notion of a “world class university” may therefore be self-defeating as it entails even closer monitoring, adaptation and adoption of indicators and steering that is outlined accordingly.
Reference32 articles.
1. Aghion, P., et al. (2010). The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US. Economic Policy, 25(61), 7–59.
2. Ahrne, G. (1994). Social organizations. London: SAGE.
3. Benner, M. (Forthcoming). The rise of Asian universities: Miracle or mirage? Ms.
4. Bjørgan, E. H. (2018, September 27). NTNU faller 100 plasser på ny rangering. UA. Retrieved from https://www.universitetsavisa.no/nyheter/2018/09/27/NTNU-faller-100-plasser-på-ny-rangering-18364582.ece.
5. Bornmann, L., & Glänzel, W. (2017). Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1077–1079.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献