1. Adiwijaya, D. R., & Rahardja, A. (2015). Practice as ‘research’ within the context of art and design academia: A brief excursion into its philosophical underpinnings. Humaniora. Language, people, art and communication studies, 6, 325–333. Retrieved January 2, 2016 from
http://research.binus.ac.id/journal/humaniora/edition/vol-6/issue-3/D75B8674-D487-4FAB-BFA4-70BC9E525D65/
.
2. Baldacchino, J. (2012). Preface: Scholarship and art’s ambiguous objects. In Daichendt, A. Artist scholar. Reflections on writing and research (pp. xiii–xxiii). United Kingdom, UK: Intellect.
3. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Sign, 28(3), 801–831.
4. Barnacle, R. (2009). Ways of being-with. In Grierson, E. & Brearley, L. (Eds.), Creative arts research. Narratives of methodologies and practices (pp. 65–74). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
5. Barrett, E. (2010). Introduction. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.). Practice as research. Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.