1. Bauch C, Kolle SN, Ramirez T, Eltze T, Fabian E, Mehling A, Teubner W, van Ravenzwaay B, Landsiedel R (2012) Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 63(3):489–504.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.013
. (Erratum in: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 64(2):285 2012)
2. Kleinstreuer N, Strickland J, Casati S, Barroso J, Zuang V, Lowit A, Matheson J, Allen D, Casey W, Whelan M (2017) Evaluating defined approaches to testing and assessment of skin sensitization potential. Presented at the society of toxicology annual meeting, March 12–16, Baltimore, MD.
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/iccvam/meetings/sot17/kleinstreuer-sotposter1-fd.pdf
. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
3. Meek ME, Palermo CM, Bachman AN, North CM, Lewis RJ (2014) Mode of action human relevance (MOA/HR) framework—evolution of the bradford hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence. Toxicol, Appl.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2984
4. National Research Council (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
5. Natsch A, Ryan CA, Foertsch L, Emter R, Jaworska J, Gerberick F, Kern P (2013) A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation. J Appl Toxicol 33:1337–1352.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2868