Disinformation as a Democratic Collective Action Problem or Why a Legal Solution Is Warranted

Author:

Hill Lisa,Douglass Max,Baltutis Ravi

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter we explore how false election information violates democratic values; in other words, we examine the extent to which and the manner in which false election information impugns the legitimacy of Australian elections, and in particular, the democratic legitimacy criteria of ‘effective participation’ and ‘enlightened understanding’. These criteria are central pillars of the free speech condition that enables any authentic democracy to function properly. Because there are few incentives to desist from polluting the election information environment and also because of the significant social costs it entails, the problem should be approached as a collective action problem rather than as an issue of individualised rights. This distinction is consistent with jurisprudence on the freedom of political communication implied in the Australian Constitution and endorsed in multiple judgements, as we show in detail in Chapter 5. We conclude this chapter by arguing that compulsory voting places an extra duty on the Australian state to ensure that voting takes place in a relatively clean information environment.

Publisher

Springer Nature Singapore

Reference17 articles.

1. Braddon-Mitchell, D., & West, C. (2004). What is free speech? Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(4), 437–460.

2. Brennan, J., & Hill, L. (2014). Compulsory voting: For and against. Cambridge University Press.

3. Browne, B. (2019a). We can handle the truth: Opportunities for truth in political advertising. The Australia Institute, viewed 17 November 2021, https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/P751-We-can-handle-the-truth-Web_0.pdf

4. Dahl, R. (1979). Procedural democracy. In P. Laslett & J. Fishkin (Eds.), Philosophy, politics and society (pp. 98–108). Basil Blackwell.

5. Fish, S. (1994). There is no such thing as free speech and it’s a good thing too. Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3