From Scientific to Syncretic Patchwork Storytelling: The Discursive Ecosystem of Italian Stop 5G Refused Knowledge Communities

Author:

Tosoni SimoneORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter addresses the discursive practices, media-related and not, adopted by the Italian Stop 5G RKC to produce, stabilise and transform its shared (refused) knowledge. Adopting an ecological approach, this inquiry has its main focus on the digital sphere as a transmedia circulation environment in which a range of discourses and narratives can coexist and interact in multiple ways, sometimes colliding and competing, sometimes adapting to each other, sometimes merging in new ways. In particular, it shows how, during the pandemic crisis, the Stop 5G RKC transformed its discursive practices (and, consequently, its shared knowledge) from a ‘scientific patchwork’ storytelling approach—based on a rigid definition of borders and selection of scientific sources—to a ‘syncretic patchwork’ storytelling approach—based on combining diverse and sometimes conflicting discursive sources (e.g. scientific knowledge, folklore, new age spirituality and conspiracy theories). This perspective allows to highlight the close relationship between the RKCs’ discursive practices, their forms of organisation and the shared (refused) knowledge they produce and reproduce.

Publisher

Springer Nature Singapore

Reference50 articles.

1. Anderson, C. W. (2016). News ecosystems. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism (pp. 410–423). Sage.

2. Bero, L. A. (2005). Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Reports, 120(2), 200–208.

3. Birchall, C., & Knight, P. (2023). Conspiracy theory in the time of Covid-19. Routledge.

4. Bisoni, C., Innocenti, V., & Pescatore, G. (2013). Il concetto di ecosistema e i media studies: Un’introduzione. In C. Bisoni & V. Innocenti (Eds.), Media mutations: Gli ecosistemi narrativi nello scenario mediale contemporaneo. Spazi, modelli, usisociali (pp. 11–26). Mucchi.

5. Bory, P., Giardullo, P., Tosoni, S., & Turrini, V. (2023). ‘We will multiply the fires of resistance’: The catalysts of dissent against institutional science and their interplay with refused knowledge communities. Public Understanding of Science, 32(1), 2–19.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3