Abstract
AbstractThis chapter addresses the discursive practices, media-related and not, adopted by the Italian Stop 5G RKC to produce, stabilise and transform its shared (refused) knowledge. Adopting an ecological approach, this inquiry has its main focus on the digital sphere as a transmedia circulation environment in which a range of discourses and narratives can coexist and interact in multiple ways, sometimes colliding and competing, sometimes adapting to each other, sometimes merging in new ways. In particular, it shows how, during the pandemic crisis, the Stop 5G RKC transformed its discursive practices (and, consequently, its shared knowledge) from a ‘scientific patchwork’ storytelling approach—based on a rigid definition of borders and selection of scientific sources—to a ‘syncretic patchwork’ storytelling approach—based on combining diverse and sometimes conflicting discursive sources (e.g. scientific knowledge, folklore, new age spirituality and conspiracy theories). This perspective allows to highlight the close relationship between the RKCs’ discursive practices, their forms of organisation and the shared (refused) knowledge they produce and reproduce.
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference50 articles.
1. Anderson, C. W. (2016). News ecosystems. In T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism (pp. 410–423). Sage.
2. Bero, L. A. (2005). Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Reports, 120(2), 200–208.
3. Birchall, C., & Knight, P. (2023). Conspiracy theory in the time of Covid-19. Routledge.
4. Bisoni, C., Innocenti, V., & Pescatore, G. (2013). Il concetto di ecosistema e i media studies: Un’introduzione. In C. Bisoni & V. Innocenti (Eds.), Media mutations: Gli ecosistemi narrativi nello scenario mediale contemporaneo. Spazi, modelli, usisociali (pp. 11–26). Mucchi.
5. Bory, P., Giardullo, P., Tosoni, S., & Turrini, V. (2023). ‘We will multiply the fires of resistance’: The catalysts of dissent against institutional science and their interplay with refused knowledge communities. Public Understanding of Science, 32(1), 2–19.