Abstract
AbstractBuilding on earlier work that identified historical paradigm shifts in open and distance learning, this chapter is concerned with analyzing the three broad pedagogical paradigms – objectivist, subjectivist, and complexivist – that have characterized learning and teaching in the field over the past half century. It goes on to discuss new paradigms that are starting to emerge, most notably in “theory-free” models enabled by developments in artificial intelligence and analytics, hologogic methods that recognize the many cultures to which we belong, and a “bricolagogic,” theory-agnostic paradigm that reflects the field’s growing maturity and depth.
Funder
Brigham Young University
The International Christian University
The University of Oldenburg
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference49 articles.
1. Anderson, T. (2001). The hidden curriculum in distance education an updated view. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(6), 28–35.
2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890
3. Barnett, R. (2011). Lifewide education: A new and transformative concept for higher education. In Learning for a complex world: A lifewide concept of learning, education and personal development (pp. 22–38). Authorhouse.
4. Brand, S. (2008). The clock of the long now: Time and responsibility. New York: Basic Books.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.