Abstract
AbstractThe emergence of newer theories for digital learning spaces occurs because of a general dissatisfaction with the theorizing of earlier generations of open and distance education (ODE). After an outline of the traditional conception of the requirements for a “learning theory,” this chapter traces the sources for this dissatisfaction in traditional theories such as behaviourism and cognitivism, then traces some theoretical attempts to address them. It identifies a range of emerging theories, including connectivist pedagogy, personal learning environments, and open educational practices, characterizing these in terms of their response to the original dissatisfaction. It then returns to the characterization of a “learning theory,” suggesting that in the light of this new work a reconceptualization of theory may be required.
Funder
Brigham Young University
The International Christian University
The University of Oldenburg
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference70 articles.
1. Anderson, C. (2008a). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
2. Anderson, T. (2008b). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 45–74). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
3. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Reiser, B., & J. (1985). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Science, 228(4698), 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.228.4698.456.
4. Barabási, A. (2003). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science and everyday life. New York: Plume Books.
5. Berners-Lee, T. (1989). Information management: A proposal. CERN. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html