Classification: The Transdiagnostic Perspective
Author:
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Link
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-287-104-6_121
Reference8 articles.
1. Call, C., Walsh, B. T., & Attia, E. (2013). From DSM-IV to DSM-5. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26(6), 532–536. A summary of the main changes involved in the move from DSM-IV to DSM-5, emphasising the utility gained by decreasing the frequency of the heterogeneous residual category that existed in DSM-IV.
2. Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (2011). Eating disorders, DSM-5 and clinical reality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 198(1), 8–10. Discussion of the problems of DSM-IV and a consideration of various possible alternative approaches including a suggestion that transdiagnostic research might be helpful to inform DSM-6.
3. Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & Shafran, R. (2003). Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: A “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(5), 509–528. Details of the transdiagnostic perspective.
4. Grilo, C. M. (2013). Why no cognitive body image feature such as overvaluation of shape/weight in the binge eating disorder diagnosis? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46(3), 208–211. A discussion of the role of over-evaluation of shape and weight in BED together with a suggestion that it should be better recognised in the diagnosis of BED.
5. Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4–12. An excellent discussion of the concepts of validity and utility as applied to psychiatric diagnosis, arguing for a clear distinction between the two.
Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Beyond eating disorders: Towards a formulation-based approach;Clinical Psychology Forum;2021-07
2. Body-, Eating-, and Exercise-Related Comparisons During Eating Disorder Recovery and Validation of the BEECOM-R;Psychology of Women Quarterly;2019-05-27
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3