Quality Assurance of Open Educational Resources

Author:

Zawacki-Richter Olaf,Müskens Wolfgang,Marín Victoria I.

Abstract

AbstractThe lack of transparency of the quality of Open Educational Resources (OER) is often seen as a barrier to the wider adoption, use, sharing, and further development of OER in the practice of teaching and learning in ODDE. Following the UNESCO Recommendation on OER, this chapter starts providing an overview of quality assurance systems from an international perspective, and the perceptions of faculty members on OER quality. Then, based on an empirical study, a quality framework and validated instrument for the evaluation and quality assessment of OER is presented – the Instrument for Quality Assurance of OER (IQOER). The second part of the chapter looks at how such an instrument can be integrated into a quality assurance process that takes into account the different goals, roles, and functions of the stakeholders involved. It becomes clear that a cultural change toward Open Educational Practice (OEP) is also needed to reach a wider acceptance of OER.

Publisher

Springer Singapore

Reference37 articles.

1. Almendro, D., & Silveira, I. F. (2018). Quality Assurance for Open Educational Resources: The OERTrust Framework. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.3.1

2. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. http://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf

3. Baas, M., Admiraal, W., & van den Berg, E. (2019). Teachers’ adoption of open educational resources in higher education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.510.

4. Bates, M., Loddington, S., Manuel, S., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Attitudes to the rights and rewards for author contributions to repositories for teaching and learning. ALT-J: Association for Learning Technology Journal, 15(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760600837066.

5. Bossu, C., Brown, M., & Bull, D. (2014a). Feasibility protocol for OER and OEP: A decision making tool for higher education. Sydney: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from https://ltr.edu.au/resources/CG10_1687_Bossu_Feasibility%20Protocol_2014.pdf

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Taxonomy of E-Course Quality Metrics and Automated Evaluation Possibilities;2024 IEEE Open Conference of Electrical, Electronic and Information Sciences (eStream);2024-04-25

2. Open educational resources on preservation: An overview;IFLA Journal;2024-02-05

3. Open Educational Resources in Supporting Online Education During COVID-19;Promoting Quality Hybrid Learning Through Leadership and Educational Management;2023-12-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3