1. Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992), “A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and non-human assemblies,” 259–264, in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
2. Amsterdamska, O. (1990), “Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!” Science, Technology, and Human Values 15 (4): 495–504.
3. Barnes, B. and Bloor, D. (1982), “Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge,” 21–47, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (Cambridge MA: MIT Press). In this chapter, and Bloor define relativism as “disinterested inquiry.” It is unlikely that Daniel Dennett or any of the philosophers who associate STS science studies with relativism have read this piece, or the defense of science and “objective reality” one finds in the writings of all the key founders of STS including the realist philosophers most prominent target, Harry Collins.
4. Bejan, A. (2019), Freedom and Evoluion: Hierarchy in Nature, Society and Science (New York: Springer).
5. Berreby, D. (1994), “And now, overcoming all binary oppositions, it’s… That Damned Elusive Bruno Latour,” Lingua Franca 4 (October): 26.