Re-envisioning Women’s Empowerment: A Maqasid Approach to Understanding Women’s Status and Rights in Islam

Author:

Abdelgafar Basma I.

Abstract

AbstractLike other human rights treatises, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) has elicited moral-religious responses from both state and non-state actors, especially in predominantly Muslim societies. The reactions are divided, with supporters and opponents using selective traditional arguments. This paper suggests that the Islamic response lacks a comprehensive approach and is fragmented, relying on partialistic views of the Shariah and offers to adopt a new maqasid methodology (NMM) to examine the status and rights of women in Islam. The paper challenges the focus on inequality as the main cause of injustice and argues that empowering women involves recognizing their relationship with their Creator as well as their relationships to their own selves, other individuals and groups, and all other creatures. The dominance of two policy positions (full acceptance or acceptance with reservations) that assume or neglect these deeper issues is inadequate and does not reflect the potential of an Islamic perspective. The Islamic perspective has yet to be fully explored and cannot endorse positions that view women in conflict with men or that are based on false premises.

Publisher

Springer Nature Singapore

Reference18 articles.

1. Abou El Fadl, K. (2009). The human rights commitment in modern Islam. In Z. Anwar (Ed.), Wanted: Equality and justice in the Muslim family (pp. 133–178). Sisters in Islam.

2. Abul-Fadl, M. (1993). Revisiting the woman question: An Islamic perspective. The Chicago theological seminary, register (Vol. lXXXIII, pp. 28–51), Winter–Spring (1–2).

3. Auda, J. (2021). Re-envisioning Islamic scholarship. Claritas.

4. Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. (1995, September 15). Fourth world conference on women, UN Doc. A/CONF.177/20, 1995 and UN Doc. A/CONF.177/20/Add.1.

5. Brooks, R. E. (2002). Feminism and international law: An opportunity for transformation. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 14, 345–361.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3