Prioritizing Python Code Smells for Efficient Refactoring Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prioritizing Python Code Smells for Efficient Refactoring Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach

Published:2021-08-18 Issue: Volume: Page:105-122
ISSN:2194-5357
Container-title:Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Gupta Aakanshi^ORCID,Sharma Deepanshu^ORCID,Phulli Kritika^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Singapore

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-16-2594-7_9

Reference39 articles.

1. Lenarduzzi, V., Saarimäki, N. & Taibi, D. (2020). Some sonarqube issues have a significant but small effect on faults and changes. A large-scale empirical study. Journal of Systems and Software, 170, 110750.

2. Narasimhan, V. L. (2008). A risk management toolkit for integrated engineering asset maintenance. Australian journal of mechanical engineering, 5(2), 105–114.

3. Fowler, M., Beck, K., &, Opdyke, W.R. (1997, June). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code. In 11th European Conference. Jyväskylä, Finland.

4. Fowler, M. (2018, Novmber 20). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code. Addison-Wesley Professional.

5. Tan, J., Feitosa, D., Avgeriou, P., & Lungu, M. (2020). Evolution of technical debt remediation in Python: A case study on the Apache Software Ecosystem. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, p. e2319.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Severity Assessment of Python Code Smells;IEEE Access;2023

2. A Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach to Analyze Python Code Smells;Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering;2022