Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference11 articles.
1. Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., Shadbolt, N.: ‘it’s reducing a human being to a percentage’ perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14 (2018)
2. Karimi, A.H., Schölkopf, B., Valera, I.: Algorithmic recourse: from counterfactual explanations to interventions. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2021, pp. 353–362. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021)
3. Kononenko, I.: Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif. Intell. Med. 23(1), 89–109 (2001)
4. Peng, A., Simard-Halm, M.: The perils of objectivity: towards a normative framework for fair judicial decision-making. In: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 343–343 (2020)
5. Redmiles, E.M., et al.: A comprehensive quality evaluation of security and privacy advice on the web. In: 29th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 2020), pp. 89–108 (2020)