Does Honorific Usage in Audit Reports Signal the Impairment of Auditor Independence? Evidence from Chinese Special Treatment Firms
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Reference73 articles.
1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69-87
2. APB Ethical Standard No. 4. (2004). Fees, remuneration and evaluation policies, litigation, gifts and hospitality. (Re-issued), U.S: Auditing Public Board
3. Ashbaugh H, Lafond R, Mayhew BW (2003) Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78(3):611–639
4. Badolato P, Donelson D, Ege M (2014) Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. J Account Econ 58(2–3):208–230
5. Becker CL, DeFond ML, Jiambalvo J, Subramanyam KR (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1):1–24