Author:
Amelung Nina,Granja Rafaela,Machado Helena
Abstract
Abstract
The Netherlands’ DNA database was legally established in 1994 and became operational in 1997. It represents one of the mid-sized databases in the EU. The Netherlands has a track record of ‘innovation’ regarding the regulation and practical application of genetic technologies for forensic purposes. The Netherlands was involved with the Prüm regime from its beginnings in 2005. In terms of bordering practices, the country serves as an exemplary case of an expansive and diffusive mode of debordering. This positioning derives from the fact that the Netherlands has been a front-runner in building and implementing the technical framework for Prüm in its most expansive form; it is currently one of the most active countries in the Prüm regime. In addition, the Netherlands has also proactively trained other Member States, guiding them towards effective implementation and thus diffusing the expansive mode of debordering.
Reference29 articles.
1. Council of the European Union. (2020). Working party on JHA Information Exchange (IXIM) 5322/19. Brussels
2. ENFSI. (2017). DNA database management. Review and recommendation. Retrieved from
http://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/final_version_enfsi_2016_document_on_dna-database_management_0.pdf
3. Granja, R., & Machado, H. (2019). Ethical controversies of familial searching: The views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom and in Poland. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(6), 1068–1092.
4. Granja, R., Machado, H., & Queirós, F. (2020). The (De)materialization of criminal bodies in forensic DNA phenotyping. Body & Society.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X20919168
5. Hopman, R. (2020). Opening up forensic DNA phenotyping: The logics of accuracy, commonality and valuing. New Genetics and Society, 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2020.1755638
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Forensic DNA Database;Fundamentals of Forensic Biology;2024