Author:
Amelung Nina,Granja Rafaela,Machado Helena
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter introduces the concept of ‘biobordering’. Taking the nationally grown crime control regimes into account, we argue that the proposed concept of bioborders is useful in capturing how the territorial foundations of national state autonomy are partially reclaimed (what we call rebordering) and at the same time partially purposefully suspended (what we call debordering). The concept of biobordering is particularly fruitful for understanding how modes of bordering entangle with large-scale IT database infrastructures for the exchange of biometric data in the context of crime control. It highlights in particular the legal, scientific, technical, political and ethical dimensions of data exchange across borders across the EU. The chapter reviews recent insights from border studies and continues by outlining components and dynamics of biobordering that make bioborders more or less permeable for expansive biometric data exchange.
Reference39 articles.
1. Amelung, N., & Machado, M. (2019). ‘Bio-bordering’ processes in the EU: De-bordering and re-bordering along transnational systems of biometric database technologies. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 5(4), 392–408. Retrieved from
http://www.inderscience.com/offer.php?id=105813
2. Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography, 25(3), 336–351.
3. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London and New York: Verso.
4. Bantekas, I., & Nash, S. (2007). International criminal law. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
5. Broeders, D., & Dijstelbloem, H. (2016). The datafication of mobility and migration management: The mediating state and its consequences. In I. Van der Ploeg & J. Pridmore (Eds.), Digitizing identities: Doing identity in a networked world (pp. 242–260). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756400