1. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller (Eds.) Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Chan, J. W. S. (2015). Teachers’ understanding of the purposes of group work and their relationship with practice. DPhil dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
3. Edwards, A. (1989). Identity Construction and Schooling. In K. Reid (Ed.), Helping Troubled Pupils at School (pp. 147–155). Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Edwards, A. (2007). An interesting resemblance: Vygotsky, mead and american pragmatism. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. Wertsch (Eds.) The cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 77–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Edwards, A. (2017). Cultural historical theory and pedagogy: The influence of Vygotsky on the field. In R. MacLean (Ed.), Handbook on Life in Schools and Classrooms: Past, present and future visions. Dordrecht: Springer.