1. Barić, H., Baždarić, K., Glasnović, A., & Gajović, S. (2017). Why scholarly publishing might be a bubble. Croat Med J., 58, 1–3.
https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.1
.
2. Carolina Consortium on Human Development. (1996). Developmental science: A collaborative statement. In R. B. Cairns, G. Elder, & E. J. Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 1–6). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Charlton, B. G. (2008). Zombie science: A sinister consequence of evaluating scientific theories purely on the basis of enlightened self-interest. Med Hypotheses, 71(3), 327–329. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.mehy.2008.05.018.
4. Dafermos, M., & Marvakis, A. (2006). Critiques in psychology–critical psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 5, 1–20.
5. Dafermos, M. (2014). Vygotsky’s analysis of the crisis in psychology: Diagnosis, treatment, and relevance. Theory and Psychology, 24(2), 147–165.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314523694
.