Author:
Stone Mark H.,Stenner A. Jackson
Abstract
AbstractSeveral concepts from Georg Rasch's last papers are discussed. The key one is comparison because Rasch considered the method of comparison fundamental to science. From the role of comparison stems scientific inference made operational by a properly developed frame of reference producing specific objectivity. The exact specifications Rasch outlined for making comparisons are explicated from quotes, and the role of causality derived from making comparisons is also examined. Understanding causality has implications for what can and cannot be produced via Rasch measurement. His simple examples were instructive, but the implications are far reaching upon first establishing the key role of comparison.
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference27 articles.
1. Andrich, D. (1982). A index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional K.R.20 index, and the Guttman Scale response pattern. Educational Research and Perspectives, 9, 95–104.
2. Andrich, D. (1985). An elaboration of Guttman scaling with Rasch models for measurement. In N. Brandon-Tuman (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 30–80). Jossey-Bass.
3. Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Sage.
4. Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind. Cambridge University Press.
5. Brogden, H. E. (1977). The Rasch model, the law of comparative judgment and additive conjoint measurement. Psychometrika, 42, 631–634.