Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference19 articles.
1. Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 37(4), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801
2. Bliss, L. (2022). The quarantine atlas: Mapping global life. Black Dog & Leventhal.
3. Chan, B., Chau, B., Ihnatovych, D., & Schembri, N. (2016). “Safe injection and needle disposal spaces for UBC! Now!” Collective reflections on a cellphilm workshop. In K. MacEntee, C. Burkholder, & J. Schwab-Cartas (Eds.), What’s a cellphilm? Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism (pp. 119–134). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_8
4. Dockney, J., & Tomaselli, K. G. (2010). Third screens, third cinema, third worlds and triadomania: Examining cellphilm aesthetics in visual culture. Communitas, 15, 97–111.
5. Edvardsson, D., & Street, A. (2007). Sense or no-sense: The nurse as embodied ethnographer. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 13(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00605.x