Seeking Legitimation in Political Uncertainties: Reforming the Media

Author:

Kow Kwan Yee,Khoo Ying Hooi

Abstract

AbstractThe media in Malaysia have long been controlled by censorship laws, and media bias has long been identified as a key hindrance to progressive discussion in the public sphere, as the government traditionally controls the media. The former Pakatan Harapan (PH) government made media reform promises in their election manifesto, which covered the repeal of laws deemed oppressive and a threat to free speech, and importantly, the support for self-regulation mechanisms through a media council. The Malaysian Media Council (MMC) was formed in December 2019 with 17 pro-tem committee members. Yet, the future of media reform is uncertain because systemic barriers remain. Besides the continued existence of censorship laws, some media organisations retain patronage by political parties and different sectors of society have distinct expectations of policy outcomes. Moreover, the fate of media reform is unclear after the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government came to power in late February 2020. This chapter employs a content analysis of press releases and news articles, supplemented by participant observation, to explore the legitimation of media reform. It first provides an overview of progress on media reform, and then analyses the challenges and barriers faced by members of the MMC and activists who fight for media reform. This chapter suggests that Malaysia is expected to continue to witness policies that limit media freedom rather than those that pursue media reform.

Publisher

Springer Nature Singapore

Reference69 articles.

1. Abbott, J. P. (2004). The internet, Reformasi and democratization in Malaysia. In E. T. Gomez (Ed.), The state of Malaysia: Ethnicity, equity and reform (pp. 79–104). Routledge.

2. Moten, A. R. (2009). 2008 general elections in Malaysia: Democracy at work. Japanese Journal of Political Science., 10(1), 21–42.

3. AFP. (2008, March 25). M’sia PM says ‘big mistake’ to ignore cyber-campaign. AsiaOne. Retrieved from https://www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Malaysia/Story/A1Story20080325-56156.html

4. Amnesty International (2016, March 11). Malaysia: End unprecedented crackdown on hundreds of critics. Retrieved September 21, 2020, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2016/03/malaysia-end-unprecedented-crackdown-on-hundreds-ofcritics-through-sedition-act/

5. Bernama. (2018, October 9). Sedition Act will continue to be applied for now, says Dr M. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/10/09/pm-no-timeline-to-repeal-law-sedition-act-will-continue-to-be-applied-for-now-says-dr-m/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3